Bernard Madoffs fraud victims denied top-up funds

By James Quinn, US Business Editor Published: 9:00PM GMT 02 March 2010

In a turning point decision, that could leave "in the money" investors open to authorised claims from those who lost out, Judge Burton Lifland ruled that those who were "net winners" from the account should not be entitled to a share of supports recovered. The statute corroborated up an progressing preference by Irving Picard, the failure keeper charged with recuperating Madoff"s blank billions.

Mr Picard has regularly confirmed that the fairest approach to provide investors was to pay off those who suffered tangible waste at the hands of Madoff.

Madoff"s former operations arch charged with rascal Madoff"s daughter-in-law seeks to shift her name Bernard Madoff"s family underneath examination by US prosecutors SFO ends examination of Madoff"s UK arm, no charges Bernard Madoff changed to jail sanatorium UBS and E&Y face Bernard Madoff exam cases

However the "net winners" had claimed that they additionally lost out, because, according to paper statements finished with by Madoff, their tangible investments were most incomparable than the income withdrawn.

The formidable authorised disaster is a by-product of Madoff"s enlarged ponzi intrigue , in that investors were hoodwinked for some-more than twenty years in to desiring their investments were delivering annual earnings in additional of 10pc.

In fact, investments were simply placed in to one large bank account, and when investors longed for to set free a share of their "gains", Madoff simply handed over income that might have belonged to alternative investors.

The new statute privately relates to eligibility to request for supports from the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC), the US physique that protects bonds investors to as most as $500,000 of their holdings.

As of the finish of last week, a little 12,047 investors had done claims to the SIPC, of that usually 1,936 had been allowed, with $650m of SIPC coverage committed.

Mr Picard, who was allocated by the SIPC to redeem assets, has to date found in additional of $1.5bn from the fraud, but is carefree of uncovering billions some-more in sequence to pay off investors.

The expect distance of the rascal stays a mystery, however. During his Dec 2008 admission to sons Mark and Andrew, Madoff himself estimated the scale of his rascal to have been $50bn, but that rose to $64.8bn, the volume of income prosecutors pronounced was allegedly in investor"s falsified accounts at the finish of Nov 2008. Lawyers behaving for the "net winners" pronounced they are expected to interest Judge Lifland"s ruling.

Meanwhile, a Luxembourg justice will on Wednesday order either investors in the $1.7bn LuxAlpha and LuxInvest tributary supports that invested without delay with Madoff can find remuneration from UBS, that was the protector for the dual funds.

UBS has consistently pronounced that it acted as merely protector to the fund, and did not suggest Madoff to the clients.