Baroness Uddin cleared over expenses scandal

By Robert Winnett 1101AM GMT twelve Mar 2010

Baroness Uddin Photo UPPA/Photoshot

The Crown Prosecution Service voiced the end not to move charges opposite the politician, who was indicted of inappropriately claiming thousands of pounds in expenses.

The counterpart told the House authorities that her "main" home was a skill in Kent notwithstanding carrying an additional residence in London. Neighbours at the Kent skill pronounced that they had frequency seen her there.

Play about "innocent" MP held up in losses liaison Ann and Alan Keen told to pay off usually �1,500 Three MPs in the wharf over losses claims MPs" losses "fraud" box the assign piece Nick Clegg "no backroom deals" prior to choosing MPs losses MPs finished arrogant legislature taxation claims

However, a new statute by the Lords authorities dynamic that peers could commission a skill as their "main" home even if they usually "visit" it at slightest once a month.

Three Labour MPs and a Conservative counterpart yesterday told a decider they dictated to make use of a 320-year-old law to disagree they should not be prosecuted.

MPs David Chaytor, Elliot Morley and Jim Devine, along with Lord Hanningfield, will demand their box should not be attempted by a jury and instead dealt with by House of Commons authorities.

The 4 were charged last month. The CPS voiced there was deficient justification to move charges opposite a fifth politician, Labour counterpart Lord Clarke of Hampstead.

In an rare conference at City of Westminster Magistrates" Court yesterday, all 4 Parliamentarians pronounced they would beg not guilty to fiddling claims for allowances.

The MPs asked to be immune from station in the secure potion wharf at the behind of the justice - but their ask was refused.

District Judge Timothy Workman concluded the box was so critical it should be listened at a higher justice and expelled the 4 defendants on umbrella bail to crop up at Southwark Crown Court on Mar 30.

If convicted, they face a limit judgment of 7 years in prison.

Barrister Julian Knowles, for the MPs, told the justice they would disagree they were stable by parliamentary privilege, lonesome in the 1689 Bill of Rights.

"My clients should not be accepted as observant that they are on top of the law - that would be utterly wrong," he said.

"Parliamentary payoff is piece of the law - and it is for Parliament to request the law in their cases."

He pronounced the box was of "high inherent importance" but combined the rapist courts had "no jurisdiction" over them.

"Proceedings in Parliament cannot be impeached or questioned in any justice or place outward Parliament," he said.

Addressing a justice packaged with reporters and members of the public, he stressed the men denied any wrong-doing.

"They unquestionably and resolutely say their innocence," he said.

In a apart conference rught away after the MPs", the justice was told Hanningfield would additionally disagree he was lonesome by Parliamentary privilege.

His counsel Rupert Bowers pronounced he would repudiate charges of poorly claiming for "repayment of travelling and alternative expenses".

The 3 MPs and counterpart left justice but commenting where they were mobbed by the media and a handful of protesters chanting "give us the income back", "pigs" and "oink, oink".

In a statement, Hanningfield pronounced he was "devastated" at the proceedings.

His orator Mark Spragg pronounced "He is ravaged to be in this position. He feels he has been singled out. He does not hold he has finished anything dishonest."

Bury North MP Chaytor, 60, of Todmorden, Lancashire, is indicted of secretly claiming rent on a London prosaic he owned, secretly filing invoices for IT work and renting a skill from his mother, opposite regulations.

Scunthorpe MP Morley, 57, of Winterton, North Lincolnshire, allegedly secretly claimed �30,428 in seductiveness payments in between 2004 and 2007 towards a debt on his home he had already paid off.

Livingston MP Devine, 56, of Bathgate, West Lothian, is pronounced to have poorly submitted dual invoices value a sum of �5,505 for services supposing by Armstrong Printing Limited.

He additionally faces a second assign alleging he dishonestly claimed cleaning and upkeep costs of �3,240 by submitting fake invoices from Tom O"Donnell Hygiene and Cleaning Services.

Hanningfield, additionally well known as Paul White, 69, of West Hanningfield, nearby Chelmsford, Essex, faced 6 charges of creation prejudiced claims for travelling allowances.

Each assign claimed the former personality of Essex County Council "purported to show that you were entitled to be paid losses when the conditions entitling you to remuneration of such losses had not been fulfilled".